CASTLE
By
Anthony Trollope
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY ALGAR
CONTENTS:
CHAPTER
I THE BARONY OF DESMOND
CHAPTER
V THE FITZGERALDS OF CASTLE RICHMOND
CHAPTER
VI THE KANTURK HOTEL, SOUTH MAIN STREET, CORK
CHAPTER
VIII GORTNACLOUGH AND BERRYHILL
CHAPTER
X THE RECTOR OF DRUMBARROW AND HIS WIFE
CHAPTER
XIII MR. MOLLETT RETURNS TO SOUTH MAIN STREET
CHAPTER
XIV THE REJECTED SUITOR
CHAPTER
XVI THE PATH BENEATH THE ELMS
CHAPTER
XVIII THE RELIEF COMMITTEE
CHAPTER
XIX THE FRIEND OF THE FAMILY
CHAPTER
XXII THE TELLING OF THE TALE
CHAPTER
XXIII BEFORE BREAKFAST AT HAP HOUSE
CHAPTER
XXIV AFTER BREAKFAST AT HAP HOUSE
CHAPTER
XXV A MUDDY WALK ON A WET MORNING
CHAPTER
XXVIII FOR A' THAT AND A' THAT
CHAPTER
XXIX ILL NEWS FLIES FAST
CHAPTER
XXXII PREPARATIONS FOR GOING
CHAPTER
XXXV HERBERT FITZGERALD IN LONDON
CHAPTER
XXXVI HOW THE EARL WAS WON
CHAPTER
XXXVII A TALE OF A TURBOT
CHAPTER
XXXIX FOX-HUNTING IN SPINNY LANE
CHAPTER
XL THE FOX IN HIS EARTH
CHAPTER
XLI THE LOBBY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.
CHAPTER
XLIII PLAYING ROUNDERS
"Castle Richmond" was written in 1861, long after
Trollope had left
The value of the story is rather documentary than literary. It contains several graphic scenes descriptive of the great Irish famine. Trollope observed carefully, and on the whole impartially, though his powers of discrimination were not quite fine enough to make him an ideal annalist.
Still, such as they were, he has used them here with no inconsiderable effect. His desire to be fair has led him to lay stress in an inverse ratio to his prepossessions, and his Priest is a better man than his parson.
The best, indeed the only piece of real characterization in the book is the delineation of Abe Mollett. This unscrupulous blackmailer is put before us with real art, with something of the loving preoccupation of the hunter for his quarry. Trollope loved a rogue, and in his long portrait gallery there are several really charming ones. He did not, indeed, perceive the aesthetic value of sin--he did not perceive the esthetic value of anything,--and his analysis of human nature was not profound enough to reach the conception of sin, crime being to him the nadir of downward possibility--but he had a professional, a sort of half Scotland Yard, half master of hounds interest in a criminal. "See," he would muse, "how cunningly the creature works, now back to his earth, anon stealing an unsuspected run across country, the clever rascal"; and his ethical disapproval ever, as usual, with English critics of life, in the foreground, clearly enhanced a primitive predatory instinct not obscurely akin, a cynic might say, to those dark impulses he holds up to our reprobation. This self-realization in his fiction is one of Trollope's principal charms. Never was there a more subjective writer. Unlike Flaubert, who laid down the canon that the author should exist in his work as God in creation, to be, here or there, dimly divined but never recognized, though everywhere latent, Trollope was never weary of writing himself large in every man, woman, or child he described.
The illusion of objectivity which he so successfully achieves is due to the fact that his mind was so perfectly contented with its hereditary and circumstantial conditions, was itself so perfectly the mental equivalent of those conditions. Thus the perfection of his egotism, tight as a drum, saved him. Had it been a little less complete, he would have faltered and bungled; as it was, he had the naive certainty of a child, to whose innocent apprehension the world and self are one, and who therefore I cannot err.
ALGAR
I wonder whether the novel-reading world--that part of it, at least, which may honour my pages-will be offended if I lay the plot of this story in Ireland! That there is a strong feeling against things Irish it is impossible to deny. Irish servants need not apply; Irish acquaintances are treated with limited confidence; Irish cousins are regarded as being decidedly dangerous; and Irish stories are not popular with the booksellers.
For myself, I may say that if I ought to know anything about
any place, I ought to know something about
Irish novels were once popular enough. But there is a fashion in novels, as there is in colours and petticoats; and now I fear they are drugs in the market. It is hard to say why a good story should not have a fair chance of success whatever may be its bent; why it should not be reckoned to be good by its own intrinsic merits alone; but such is by no means the case. I was waiting once, when I was young at the work, in the back parlour of an eminent publisher, hoping to see his eminence on a small matter of business touching a three--volumed manuscript which I held in my hand. The eminent publisher, having probably larger fish to fry, could not see me, but sent his clerk or foreman to arrange the business.
"A novel, is it, sir?" said the foreman.
"Yes," I answered; "a novel."
"It depends very much on the subject," said the foreman, with a thoughtful and judicious frown--"upon the name, sir, and the subject;--daily life, sir; that's what suits us; daily English life. Now, your historical novel, sir. is not worth the paper it's written on."
I fear that Irish character is in these days considered almost as unattractive as historical incident; but, nevertheless, I will make the attempt. I am now leaving the Green Isle and my old friends, and would fain say a word of them as I do so. If I do not say that word now it will never be said.
The readability of a story should depend, one would say, on
its intrinsic merit rather than on the site of its adventures. No one will
think that Hampshire is better for such a purpose than
Perhaps the most interesting, and certainly the most
beautiful part of
Within this district, but hardly within that portion of it
which is most attractive to tourists, is situated the house and domain of
Castle Richmond. The river Blackwater rises in the