A Little Tour In France
By
Henry James
CONTENTS:
I. 4
II. 8
III. 10
IV. 14
V. 19
VI. 24
VII. 27
VIII. 32
IX. 34
X. 36
XI. 39
XII. 43
XIII. 47
XIV. 50
XV. 53
XVI. 57
XVII. 61
XVIII. 65
XIX. 68
XX. 70
XXI. 72
XXII. 74
XXIII. 77
XXIV. 80
XXV. 83
XXVI. 87
XXVII. 90
XXVIII. 93
XXIX. 96
XXX. 100
XXXI. 103
XXXII. 105
XXXIII. 110
XXXIV. 113
XXXV. 116
XXXVI. 120
XXXVII. 123
XXXVIII. 126
XXXIX. 130
We good Americans - I say it without presumption - are too apt to think that France is Paris,
just as we are accused of being too apt to think that Paris is the celestial city. This is by no means the case, fortun-ately
for those persons who take an interest in modern Gaul,
and yet are still left vaguely unsatisfied by that epitome of civilization
which stretches from the Arc de Triomphe to the Gymnase theatre. It had already been intimated to the author
of these light pages that there are many good things in the _doux pays de
France_ of which you get no hint in a walk between those ornaments of the
capital; but the truth had been re-vealed only in quick-flashing glimpses, and
he was conscious of a desire to look it well in the face. To this end he started, one rainy morning in
mid-Septem-ber, for the charming little city of Tours, from which point it seemed possible to
make a variety of fruitful excursions.
His excursions resolved themselves ulti-mately into a journey through
several provinces, - a journey which had its dull moments (as one may defy any
journey not to have), but which enabled him to feel that his proposition was
demonstrated. France
may be Paris, but Paris
is not France;
that was perfectly evident on the return to the capital.
I must not speak, however, as if I had discovered the
provinces. They were discovered, or at
least re-vealed by BaIzac, if by any one, and are now easily accessible to
visitors. It is true,
I met no visitors, or only one or two, whom it was pleasant to meet. Throughout
my little tour I was almost the only tourist. That is perhaps one reason why it
was so successful.
I am ashamed to begin with saying that Touraine
is the garden of France; that remark has long ago lost
its bloom. The town of Tours, however, has some thing sweet and
bright, which suggests that it is sur-rounded by a land of fruits. It is a very agreeable little city; few towns
of its size are more ripe, more complete, or, I should
suppose, in better humor with themselves and less disposed to envy the
responsibili-ties of bigger places. It
is truly the capital of its smil-ing province; a region of easy abundance, of
good living, of genial, comfortable, optimistic, rather indolent opinions. Balzac says in one of his tales that the real
Tourangeau will not make an effort, or displace him-self even, to go in search
of a pleasure; and it is not difficult to understand the sources of this amiable
cynicism. He must have a vague
conviction that he can only lose by almost any change. Fortune has been kind to him: he lives in a
temperate, reasonable, sociable climate, on the banks, of a river which, it is true, sometimes
floods the country around it, but of which the ravages appear to be so easily
repaired that its aggressions may perhaps be regarded (in a region where so
many good things are certain) merely as an occasion for healthy suspense. He is surrounded by fine old traditions,
religious, social, architectural, culi-nary; and he may have the satisfaction
of feeling that he is French to the core.
No part of his admirable country is more characteristically
national. Normandy
is Normandy, Burgundy
is Burgundy, Provence
is Pro-vence; but Touraine is essentially France. It is the land of Rabelais,
of Descartes, of Balzac, of good books and good company, as well as good
dinners and good houses. George Sand has
somewhere a charm-ing passage about the mildness, the convenient quality, of
the physical conditions of central France, - "son climat souple
et chaud, ses pluies abondantes et courtes." In the autumn of 1882 the rains perhaps were
less short than abundant; but when the days were fine it was impossible that anything in the
way of weather could be more charming.
The vineyards and orchards looked rich in the fresh, gay light;
cultivation was everywhere, but everywhere it seemed to be easy. There was no
visible poverty; thrift and success pre-sented themselves as matters of good
taste. The white caps of the women
glittered in the sunshire, and their well-made sabots clicked cheerfully on the
hard, clean roads. Touraine is a land of old chateaux, - a
gallery of architectural specimens and of large hereditary pro-perties. The peasantry have less of the luxury of
ownership than in most other parts of France; though they have enough of it to
give them quite their share of that shrewdly conservative look which, in the
little, chaffering, _place_ of the market-town, the stranger ob-serves so often
in the wrinkled brown masks that sur-mount the agricultural blouse. This is, moreover, the heart of the old
French monarchy; and as that monarchy was splendid and picturesque, a
reflection of the splen-dor still glitters in the current of the Loire. Some of the
most striking events of French history have occurred on the banks of that
river, and the soil it waters bloomed for a while with the flowering of the
Renais-sance. The Loire gives a great
"style" to a landscape of which the features are not, as the phrase
is, promi-nent, and carries the eye to distances even more poetic than the
green horizons of Touraine. It is a very
fit-ful stream, and is sometimes observed to run thin and expose all the
crudities of its channel, - a great defect certainly
in a river which is so much depended upon to give an air to the places it
waters. But I speak of it as I saw it
last; full, tranquil, powerful, bending in large slow curves, and sending back
half the light of the sky. Nothing can
be finer than the view of its course which you get from the battlements and
ter-races of Amboise. As I looked down on it from that elevation
one lovely Sunday morning, through a mild glitter of autumn sunshine, it seemed
the very model of a generous, beneficent stream. The most charming part of Tours is naturally the shaded quay that
over-looks it, and looks across too at the friendly faubourg of Saint
Symphorien and at the terraced heights which rise above this. Indeed, throughout Touraine,
it is half the charm of the Loire that you can
travel beside it. The great dike which
protects it, or, protects the country from it, from Blois
to Angers, is
an admirable road; and on the other side, as well, the highway con-stantly
keeps it company. A wide river, as you
follow a wide road, is excellent company; it heightens and shortens the way.
The inns at Tours
are in another quarter, and one of them, which is
midway between the town and the station, is very good. It is worth mentioning for the fact that
every one belonging to it is extraordinarily polite, - so
unnaturally polite as at first to excite your suspicion that the hotel has some
hidden vice, so that the waiters and chambermaids are trying to pacify you in
advance. There was one waiter in
especial who was the most accomplished social being I
have ever encountered; from morning till night he kept up an inarticulate
murmur of urbanity, like the hum of a spinning-top. I may add that I discovered no dark secrets
at the Hotel de l'Univers; for it is not a secret to any traveller to-day that
the obligation to partake of a lukewarm dinner in an overheated room is as
imperative as it is detestable. For the
rest, at Tours,
there is a certain Rue Royale which has pretensions to the monumental; it was
constructed a hundred years ago, and the houses, all alike, have on a moderate
scale a pompous eighteenth-century look.
It connects the Palais de Justice, the most important secular building
in the town, with the long bridge which spans the Loire,
- the spacious, solid bridge pronounced by Balzac, in "Le Cure de
Tours," "one of the finest monuments of French
architecture." The Palais de
Justice was the seat of the Government of Leon Gambetta in the autumn of 1870,
after the dictator had been obliged to retire in his balloon from Paris, and before
the Assembly was constituted at Bordeaux.
The Germans occupied Tours
during that terrible winter; it is astonishing, the number of places the
Germans occupied. It is hardly too much
to say that wherever one goes in, certain parts of France, one encounters two great
historic facts: one is the Revolution; the other is the German invasion. The
traces of the Revolution remain in a hundred scars and bruises and mutilations,
but the visible marks of the war of 1870 have passed away. The country is so rich, so living, that she
has been able to dress her wounds, to hold up her head, to smile again; so that
the shadow of that darkness has ceased to rest upon her. But what you do not see you still may hear;
and one remembers with a certain shudder that only a few short years ago this
province, so intimately French, was under the heel of a foreign foe. To be intimately French was apparently not a
safeguard; for so successful an invader it could only be a challenge. Peace and
plenty, however, have succeeded that episode; and among the gardens and
vineyards of Touraine
it seems, only a legend the more in a country of legends.
It was not, all the same, for the sake of this check-ered
story that I mentioned the Palais de Justice and the Rue Royale. The most interesting fact, to my mind, about
the high-street of Tours
was that as you walked toward the bridge on the right-hand _trottoir_ you can
look up at the house, on the other side of the way, in which Honore de Balzac
first saw the light. That violent and
complicated genius was a child of the good-humored and succulent Touraine. There is
something anomalous in the fact, though, if one thinks about it a little, one
may discover certain correspondences between his character and that of his
native province. Strenuous, laborious,
constantly in felicitous in spite of his great successes, he suggests at times
a very different set of influences. But
he had his jovial, full-feeding side, - the side that comes out in the "Contes
Drolatiques," which are the romantic and epicurean chronicle of the old
manors and abbeys of this region. And he
was, moreover, the product of a soil into which a great deal of history had
been trodden. Balzac was genuinely as
well as affectedly monarchical, and he was saturated with, a sense of the
past. Number 39 Rue Royale - of which
the base ment, like all the basements in the Rue Royale, is occupied by a shop
- is not shown to the public; and I know not whether tradition designates the
chamber in which the author of "Le Lys dans la Vallee" opened his
eyes into a world in which he was to see and to imagine such extraordinary
things. If this were the case, I would
willingly have crossed its threshold; not for the sake of any relic of the
great novelist which it may possibly contain, nor even for that of any mystic
virtue which may be supposed to reside within its walls, but simply because to
look at those four modest walls can hardly fail to give one a strong impression
of the force of human endeavour. Balzac, in the maturity of his vision, took in
more of human life than any one, since Shakspeare, who has attempted to tell us
stories about it; and the very small scene on which his consciousness dawned is
one end of the immense scale that he traversed.
I confess it shocked me a little to find that he was born in a house
"in a row," - a house, moreover, which at the date of his birth must
have been only about twenty years old. All that is contradictory.
If the tenement selected for this honour could not be ancient and
em-browned, it should at least have been detached.
There is a charming description, in his little tale of
"La Grenadiere," of the view of the opposite side of the Loire as you
have it from the square at the end of the Rue Royale, - a square that has some
preten-sions to grandeur, overlooked as it is by the Hotel de Ville and the
Musee, a pair of edifices which directly contemplate the river, and ornamented
with marble images of Francois Rabelais and Rene Descartes. The former, erected
a few years since, is a very honor-able production; the pedastal of the latter
could, as a matter of course, only be inscribed with the _Cogito ergo Sum._ The two statues
mark the two opposite poles to which the brilliant French mind has travelled;
and if there were an effigy of Balzac at Tours, it ought to stand midway
between them. Not that he, by any means
always struck the happy mean between the sensible and the metaphysical; but one
may say of him that half of his genius looks in one direction and half in the
other. The side that turns toward
Francois Rabelais would be, on the whole, the side that takes the sun. But there is no statue of Balzac at Tours; there is only, in
one of the chambers of the melancholy museum, a rather clever, coarse bust. The
description in "La Grenadiere," of which I just spoke, is too long to
quote; neither have I space for any one of the brilliant attempts at landscape
paint-ing which are woven into the shimmering texture of "Le Lys dans la
Vallee." The little manor of
Cloche-gourde, the residence of Madame de Mortsauf, the heroine of that
extraordinary work, was within a moderate walk of Tours, and the picture in the novel is
presumably a copy from an original which it would be possible to-day to
discover. I did not, however, even make
the attempt. There are so many chateaux
in Touraine
commemorated in history, that it would take one too
far to look up those which have been com-memorated in fiction. The most I did was to endeavor to identify
the former residence of
Mademoiselle Gamard, the sinister old maid of "Le Cure de
Tours." This terrible woman occupied a small house in the rear of the
cathedral, where I spent a whole morning in wondering rather stupidly which
house it could be. To reach the cathedral from the little _place_ where we
stopped just now to look across at the Grenadiere, without, it must be
confessed, very vividly seeing it, you follow the quay to the right, and pass
out of sight of the charming _coteau_ which, from beyond the river, faces the
town, - a soft agglomeration of gardens, vine-yards, scattered villas, gables
and turrets of slate-roofed chateaux, terraces with gray balustrades,
moss-grown walls draped in scarlet Virginia-creeper. You turn into the town again beside a great
military barrack which is ornamented with a rugged mediaeval tower, a relic of
the ancient fortifications, known to the Tourangeaux of to-day as the Tour de
Guise. The young Prince of Joinville, son of that Duke of Guise who was
murdered by the order of Henry II. at Blois, was, after the death of his father,
confined here for more than two years, but made his escape one summer evening
in 1591, under the nose of his keepers, with a gallant audacity which has
attached the memory of the exploit to his sullen-looking prison. Tours
has a garrison of five regiments, and the little red-legged soldiers light up
the town. You see them stroll upon the
clean, uncommercial quay, where there are no signs of navigation, not even by
oar, no barrels nor bales, no loading nor unloading, no masts against the sky
nor booming of steam in the air. The
most active business that goes on there is that patient and fruitless angling
in, which the French, as the votaries of art for art, excel all other
people. The little soldiers, weighed
down by the contents of their enormous pockets, pass with respect from one of
these masters of the rod to the other,as he sits soaking an indefinite bait in
the large, indifferent stream. After you
turn your back to the quay you have only to go a little way before you reach
the cathedral.
II.
It is a very beautiful church of the second order of
importance, with a charming mouse-colored com-plexion and a pair of fantastic
towers. There is a commodious little
square in front of it, from which you may look up at its very ornamental face;
but for purposes of frank admiration the sides and the rear are perhaps not
sufficiently detached. The cathedral of Tours, which is dedicated
to Saint Gatianus, took a long time to build.
Begun in 1170, it was finished only in the first half of the sixteenth
century; but the ages and the weather have interfused so well the tone of the
different parts, that it presents, at first at least, no striking
incongruities, and looks even exception-ally harmonious and complete. There are many grander cathedrals, but there
are probably few more pleasing; and this effect of delicacy and grace is at its
best toward the close of a quiet afternoon, when the densely decorated towers,
rising above the little Place de l'Archeveche, lift their curious lanterns into
the slanting light, and offer a multitudinous perch to troops of circling
pigeons. The whole front, at such a
time, has an appearance of great richness, although the niches which surround
the three high doors (with recesses deep enough for several circles of
sculpture) and indent the four great buttresses that ascend beside the huge
rose-window, carry no figures beneath their little chiselled canopies. The blast of the great Revo-lution blew down
most of the statues in France,
and the wind has never set very strongly toward putting them up again. The embossed and crocketed cupolas which
crown the towers of Saint Gatien are not very pure in taste; but, like a good
many impurities, they have a certain character.
The interior has a stately slimness with which no fault is to be found, and which in the choir, rich in early glass and
surrounded by a broad passage, becomes very bold and noble. Its principal
treasure, perhaps, is the charming little tomb of the two children (who died
young) of Charles VIII. and Anne of Brittany, in white
marble, embossed with sym-bolic dolphins and exquisite arabesques. The little boy and girl lie side by side on a
slab of black marble, and a pair of small kneeling angels, both at their head
and at their feet, watch over them.
Nothing could be more perfect than this monument, which is the work of
Michel Colomb, one of the earlier glories of the French Renaissance; it is
really a lesson in good taste. Originally placed in the great abbey-church of
Saint Martin, which was for so many ages the holy place of Tours, it happily survived the devastation to
which that edifice, already sadly shattered by the wars of religion and
successive profanations, finally succumbed in 1797. In 1815 the tomb found an asylum in a quiet
corner of the cathedral.
I ought, perhaps, to be ashamed to acknowledge, that I found
the profane name of Balzac capable of adding an interest even to this venerable
sanctuary. Those who have read the terrible little story of "Le Cure de
Tours" will perhaps remember that, as I have already mentioned, the simple
and childlike old Abbe Birotteau, victim of the infernal machinations of the
Abbe Troubert and Mademoiselle Gamard, had his quarters in the house of that
lady (she had a speciality of letting lodgings to priests), which stood on the
north side of the cathedral, so close under its walls that the supporting
pillar of one of the great flying buttresses was planted in the spinster's
garden. If you wander round behind the church, in search of this more than
historic habitation, you will have oc-casion to see that the side and rear of
Saint Gatien make a delectable and curious figure. A narrow lane passes beside the high wall
which conceals from sight the palace of the archbishop, and beneath the flying
buttresses, the far-projecting gargoyles, and the fine south porch of the
church. It terminates in a little, dead, grass-grown square entitled the Place Gregoire
de Tours. All this part of the exterior
of the cathe-dral is very brown, ancient, Gothic, grotesque; Balzac calls the
whole place "a desert of stone."
A battered and gabled wing, or out-house (as it appears to be) of the
hidden palace, with a queer old stone pulpit jutting out from it, looks down on
this melancholy spot, on the other side of which is a seminary for young
priests, one of whom issues from a door in a quiet corner, and, holding it open
a moment behind him, shows a glimpse of a sunny garden, where you may fancy
other black young figures strolling up and down. Mademoiselle Gamard's house, where she took
her two abbes to board, and basely conspired with one against the other, is
still further round the cathe-dral. You
cannot quite put your hand upon it to-day, for the dwelling which you say to
yourself that it _must_ have been Mademoiselle Gamard's does not fulfil all the
conditions mentioned in BaIzac's de-scription.
The edifice in question, however, fulfils con-ditions enough; in
particular, its little court offers hospitality to the big buttress of the
church. Another buttress, corresponding
with this (the two, between them, sustain the gable of the north transept), is
planted in the small cloister, of which the door on the further side of the
little soundless Rue de la Psalette, where nothing seems ever to pass, opens
opposite to that of Mademoiselle Gamard.
There is a very genial old sacristan, who introduced me to this cloister
from the church. It is very small and
solitary, and much mutilated; but it nestles with a kind of wasted
friend-liness beneath the big walls of the cathedral. Its lower arcades have been closed, and it
has a small plot of garden in the middle, with fruit-trees which I should
imagine to be too much overshadowed. In
one corner is a remarkably picturesque turret, the cage of a winding staircase
which ascends (no great distance) to an upper gallery, where an old priest, the
_chanoine-gardien_ of the church, was walking to and fro with his
breviary. The turret, the gallery, and
even the chanoine-gardien, belonged, that sweet September morning, to the class
of objects that are dear to paint-ers in water-colors.
III.
I have mentioned the church
of Saint Martin, which was for many
years the sacred spot, the shrine of pilgrimage, of Tours.
Originally the simple burial-place of the great apostle who in the
fourth century Christianized Gaul, and who, in his day a brilliant missionary
and worker of miracles, is chiefly known to modem fame as the worthy that cut
his cloak in two at the gate of Amiens to share it with a beggar (tradition
fails to say, I believe, what he did with the other half), the abbey of Saint
Martin, through the Middle Ages, waxed rich and powerful, till it was known at
last as one of the most luxurious religious houses in Christendom, with kings
for its titular ab-bots (who, like Francis I., sometimes turned and despoiled
it) and a great treasure of precious things. It passed, however, through many
vicissitudes. Pillaged by the Normans in the ninth
century and by the Huguenots in the sixteenth, it received its death-blow from
the Revolution, which must have brought to bear upon it an
energy of destruction proportionate to its mighty bulk. At the end of the last century a huge group
of ruins alone remained, and what we see to-day may be
called the ruin of a ruin. It is
difficult to understand how so vast an ediface can have been so completely
obliterated. Its site is given up to
several ugly streets, and a pair of tall towers, separated by a space which
speaks volumes as to the size of the church, and looking across the
close-pressed roofs to the happier spires of the cathedral, preserved for the
modern world the memory of a great fortune, a great abuse, perhaps, and at all
events a great pen-alty. One may believe
that to this day a consider-able part of the foundations of the great abbey is
buried in the soil of Tours. The two surviving towers, which are
dissimilar in shape, are enormous; with those of the cathedral they form the
great landmarks of the town. One of them
bears the name of the Tour de l'Horloge; the other, the so-called Tour Charle-magne,
was erected (two centuries after her death) over the tomb of Luitgarde, wife of
the great Em-peror, who died at Tours
in 800. I do not pretend to understand
in what relation these very mighty and effectually detached masses of masonry
stood to each other, but in their gray elevation and loneliness they are
striking and suggestive to-day; holding their hoary heads far above the modern
life of the town, and looking sad and conscious, as they had outlived all
uses. I know not what is supposed to
have become of the bones of the blessed saint during the various scenes of
confusion in which they may have got mis-laid; but a mystic connection with his
wonder-working relics may be perceived in a strange little sanctuary on the
left of the street, which opens in front of the Tour Charlemagne, - the rugged
base of which, by the way, inhabited like a cave, with a diminutive doorway, in
which, as I passed, an old woman stood cleaning a pot, and a little dark window
decorated with homely flowers, would be appreciated by a painter in search of
"bits." The present shrine of
Saint Martin is enclosed (provisionally, I suppose) in a very modem structure
of timber, where in a dusky cellar, to which you descend by a wooden staircase
adorned with votive tablets and paper roses, is placed a tabernacle surrounded
by twinkling tapers and pros-trate worshippers.
Even this crepuscular vault, how-ever, fails, I think, to attain
solemnity; for the whole place is strangely vulgar and garish. The Catholic church,
as churches go to-day, is certainly the most spectacular; but it must feel that
it has a great fund of impressiveness to draw upon when it opens such sordid
little shops of sanctity as this. It is
impos-sible not to be struck with the grotesqueness of such an establishment,
as the last link in the chain of a great ecclesiastical tradition.
In the same street, on the other side, a little below, is
something better worth your visit than the shrine of Saint
Martin. Knock at a high
door in a white wall (there is a cross above it), and a fresh-faced sister of
the convent of the Petit Saint Martin will let you into the charming little
cloister, or rather fragment of a cloister.
Only one side of this exqui-site structure remains, but the whole place
is effective. In front of the beautiful arcade, which is terribly bruised and
obliterated, is one of those walks of inter-laced _tilleuls_ which are so
frequent in Touraine,
and into which the green light filters so softly through a lattice of clipped
twigs. Beyond this is a garden, and
beyond the garden are the other buildings of the Convent, - where the placid
sisters keep a school, - a test, doubtless, of placidity. The imperfect arcade, which dates from the
beginning of the sixteenth cen-tury (I know nothing of it but what is related
in Mrs. Pattison's "Rennaissance in France") is a truly en-chanting
piece of work; the cornice and the angles of the arches, being covered with the
daintiest sculpture of arabesques, flowers, fruit, medallions, cherubs,
griffins, all in the finest and most attenuated relief. It is like the chasing of a bracelet in
stone. The taste, the fancy, the
elegance, the refinement, are of those things which revive our standard of the
exquisite. Such a piece of work is the
purest flower of the French Renaissance; there is nothing more delicate in all Touraine.
There is another fine thing at Tours
which is not particularly delicate, but which makes a great impres-sion, - the-
very interesting old church of Saint Julian, lurking in a crooked corner at the
right of the Rue Royale, near the point at which this indifferent thorough-fare
emerges, with its little cry of admiration, on the bank of the Loire. Saint
Julian stands to-day in a kind of neglected hollow, where it is much shut in by
houses; but in the year 1225, when the edifice was begun, the site was
doubtless, as the architects say, more eligible. At present, indeed, when once you have caught
a glimpse of the stout, serious Romanesque tower, - which is not high, but
strong, - you feel that the building has something to say, and that you must
stop to listen to it. Within, it has a
vast and splendid nave, of immense height, - the nave of a cathedral, -with a
shallow choir and transepts, and some admir-able old glass. I spent half an hour there one morn-ing,
listening to what the church had to say, in perfect solitude. Not a worshipper entered, - not even an old
man with a broom. I have always thought
there is a sex in fine buildings; and Saint Julian, with its noble nave, is of
the gender of the name of its patron.
It was that same morning, I think, that I went in search of
the old houses of Tours;
for the town con-tains several goodly specimens of the domestic archi-tecture
of the past. The dwelling to which the
average Anglo-Saxon will most promptly direct his steps, and the only one I have
space to mention, is the so-called Maison de Tristan l'Hermite, - a gentleman
whom the readers of "Quentin Durward" will not have forgotten, - the
hangman-in-ordinary to the great King Louis XI. Unfortunately the house of
Tristan is not the house of Tristan at all; this illusion has been cruelly
dispelled. There are no illusions left, at all, in the good city of Tours, with regard to
Louis XI. His terrible castle of
Plessis, the picture of which sends a shiver through the youthful reader of
Scott, has been reduced to sub-urban insignificance; and the residence of his
_triste compere,_ on the front of which a festooned rope figures as a motive
for decoration, is observed to have been erected in the succeeding
century. The Maison de Tristan may be
visited for itself, however, if not for Walter Scott; it is an exceedingly
picturesque old facade, to which you pick your way through a narrow and
tortuous street, - a street terminating, a little be-yond it, in the walk
beside the river. An elegant Gothic doorway
is let into the rusty-red brick-work, and strange little beasts crouch at the
angles of the windows, which are surmounted by a tall graduated gable, pierced
with a small orifice, where the large surface of brick, lifted out of the
shadow of the street, looks yellow and faded.
The whole thing is disfigured and decayed; but it is a capital subject
for a sketch in colors. Only I must wish
the sketcher better luck - or a better temper - than my own. If he ring the bell to be admitted to see the
court, which I believe is more sketchable still, let him have patience to wait
till the bell is answered. He can do the
outside while they are coming.
The Maison de Tristan, I say, may be visited for itself; but
I hardly know what the remnants of Plessis-les-Tours may be visited for. To reach them you wander through crooked
suburban lanes, down the course of the Loire, to a rough, undesirable,
incon-gruous spot, where a small, crude building of red brick is pointed out to
you by your cabman (if you happen to drive) as the romantic abode of a
super-stitious king, and where a strong odor of pigsties and other unclean
things so prostrates you for the moment that you have no energy to protest
against the obvious fiction. You enter a
yard encumbered with rubbish and a defiant dog, and an old woman emerges from a
shabby lodge and assures you that you are indeed in an historic place. The red brick building, which looks like a
small factory, rises on the ruins of the favorite residence of the dreadful
Louis. It is now occupied by a company
of night-scavengers, whose huge carts are drawn up in a row before it. I know not whether this be what is called the
irony of fate; at any rate, the effect of it is to accentuate strongly the fact
(and through the most susceptible of our senses) that there is no honor for the
authors of great wrongs. The dreadful
Louis is reduced simply to an offence to the nostrils. The old woman shows you a few fragments, -
several dark, damp, much-encumbered vaults, de-nominated dungeons, and an old
tower staircase, in good condition.
There are the outlines of the old moat; there is also the outline of the
old guard-room, which is now a stable; and there are other vague out-lines and
inconsequent lumps, which I have forgotten. You need all your imagination, and
even then you cannot make out that Plessis was a castle of large ex-tent,
though the old woman, as your eye wanders over the neighboring _potagers,_
talks a good deal about the gardens and the park. The place looks mean and flat; and as you
drive away you scarcely know whether to be glad or sorry that all those
bristling horrors have been reduced to the commonplace.
A certain flatness of impression awaits you also, I think,
at Marmoutier, which is the other indisuensable excursion in the near
neighborhood of Tours. The remains of this famous abbey lie on the
other bank of the stream, about a mile and a half from the town. You follow the
edge of the big brown river; of a fine afternoon you will be glad to go further
still. The abbey has gone the way of
most abbeys; but the place is a restoration as well as a ruin, inasmuch as the
sisters of the Sacred Heart have erected a terribly modern convent here. A large Gothic doorway, in a high fragment of
ancient wall, admits you to a garden-like enclosure, of great extent, from
which you are further introduced into an extraordinarily tidy little parlor,
where two good nuns sit at work. One of
these came out with me, and showed me over the place, -a very definite little
woman, with pointed features, an intensely distinct enunciation, and those
pretty man-ners which (for whatever other teachings it may be responsible) the
Catholic church so often instils into its
functionaries. I have never seen a woman
who had got her lesson better than this little trotting, murmur-ing, edifying
nun. The interest, of Marmoutier to-day
is not so much an interest of vision, so to speak, as an interest of
reflection, - that is, if you choose to reflect (for instance) upon the wondrous
legend of the seven sleepers (you may see where they lie in a row), who lived
together - they were brothers and cousins - in primitive piety, in the
sanctuary constructed by the blessed Saint Martin (emulous of his precursor,
Saint Gatianus), in the face of the hillside that overhung the Loire, and who,
twenty-five years after his death, yielded up their seven souls at the same
moment, and enjoyed the curious privilege of retaining in their faces, in spite
of this process, the rosy tints of life.
The abbey of Marmoutier, which sprung from the grottos in the cliff to
which Saint Gatianus and Saint Martin re-tired
to pray, was therefore the creation of the latter worthy, as the other great
abbey, in the town proper, was the monument of his repose. The cliff is still there; and a winding staircase,
in the latest taste, en-ables you conveniently to explore its recesses. These sacred niches are scooped out of the
rock, and will give you an impression if you cannot do without one. You will
feel them to be sufficiently venerable when you learn that the particular
pigeon-hole of Saint Gatianus, the first Christian missionary to Gaul, dates from the third century. They have been dealt with as the Catholic
church deals with most of such places to-day; polished and furnished up;
labelled and ticketed, - _edited,_ with notes, in short, like an old book. The process is a mistake,
- the early editions had more sanctity.
The modern buildings (of the Sacred Heart), on which you look down from
these points of vantage, are in the vulgar taste which seems doomed to stamp
itself on all new Catholic work; but there was never-theless a great sweetness
in the scene. The afternoon was lovely,
and it was flushing to a close. The
large garden stretched beneath us, blooming with fruit and wine and succulent
vegetables, and beyond it flowed the shining river. The air was still, the shadows were long, and
the place, after all, was full of memories, most of which might pass for
virtuous. It certainly was better than
Plessis-les-Tours.
IV.
Your business at Tours
is to make excursions; and if you make them all, you will be very well
occupied. Touraine is rich in antiquities; and an hour's drive from the town in
almost any direction will bring you to the knowledge of some curious fragment
of domestic or ecclesiastical architecture, some turreted manor, some lonely
tower, some gabled village, or historic site.
Even, however, if you do everything, - which was not my case, - you
cannot hope to relate everything, and, fortunately for you, the excursions
divide them-selves into the greater and the less. You may achieve most of the greater in a week
or two; but a summer in Touraine
(which, by the way must be a charming thing) would contain none too many days
for the others. If you come down to Tours from Paris, your best economy is to
spend a few days at Blois, where a clumsy, but rather attractive little inn, on
the edge of the river, will offer you a certain amount of that familiar and
intermittent hospitality which a few weeks spent in the French provinces
teaches you to regard as the highest attainable form of accommodation. Such an economy I was unable to
practise. I could only go to Blois (from Tours)
to spend the day; but this feat I accomplished twice over. It is a very sympathetic little town, as we
say nowadays, and one might easily resign one's self to a week there. Seated on the north bank of the Loire, it presents a bright, clean face to the sun, and
has that aspect of cheerful leisure which belongs to all white towns that reflect, themselves in shining waters. It is the water-front only of Blois, however, that
exhibits, this fresh complexion; the in-terior is of a proper brownness, as
befits a signally historic city. The
only disappointment I had there was the discovery that the castle, which is the
special object of one's pilgrimage, does not overhang the river, as I had
always allowed myself to understand. It
overhangs the town, but it is scarcely visible from the stream. That peculiar good fortune is reserved for Amboise and Chaurnont.
The Chateau de Blois is one of the most beautiful and
elaborate of all the old royal residences of this part of France, and I
suppose it should have all the honors of my description. As you cross its threshold, you step straight
into the brilliant movement of the French Renaissance. But it is too rich to describe, -I can only
touch it here and there. It must be
pre-mised that in speaking of it as one sees it to-day, one speaks of a
monument unsparingly restored. The work
of restoration has been as ingenious as it is pro-fuse, but it rather chills
the imagination. This is perhaps almost
the first thing you feel as you ap-proach the castle from the streets of the
town. These little streets, as they,
leave the river, have pretensions to romantic steepness; one of them, indeed,
which resolves itself into a high staircase with divergent wings (the _escalier
monumental_), achieved this result so successfully as to remind me vaguely - I
hardly know why - of the great slope of the Capitol, beside the Ara Coeli, at
Rome. The view of that part of the
castle which figures to-day as the back (it is the only aspect I had seen
reproduced) exhibits the marks of restoration with the greatest assurance. The long facade, consisting only of balconied
windows deeply recessed, erects itself on the summit of a considerable hill,
which gives a fine, plunging movement to its foundations. The deep niches of the windows are all aglow
with color. They have been repainted
with red and blue, relieved with gold figures; and each of them looks more like
the royal box at a theatre than like the aperture of a palace dark with
memories. For all this, however, and in
spite of the fact that, as in some others of the chateaux of Touraine,
(always excepting the colossal Chambord, which is not in Touraine!)
there is less vastness than one had expected, the least hospitable aspect of Blois is abundantly
impressive. Here, as elsewhere, lightness and grace are the key-note; and the
recesses of the windows, with their happy proportions, their sculpture, and their
color, are the empty frames of brilliant pictures. They need the figure of a Francis I. to
complete them, or of a Diane de Poitiers, or even of a Henry III. The base of this exquisite structure emerges
from a bed of light verdure, which has been allowed to mass itself there, and
which contributes to the springing look of the walls; while on the right it
joins the most modern portion of the castle, - the building erected, on
founda-tions of enormous height and solidity, in 1635, by Gaston d'Orleans. This fine, frigid mansion - the proper view
of it is from the court within - is one of the masterpieces of Francois
Mansard, whom. a kind pro-vidence did not allow to
make over the whole palace in the superior manner of his superior age. This had been a part of Gaston's plan, - he
was a blunderer born, and this precious project was worthy of him. This
execution of it would surely have been one of the great misdeeds of
history. Partially performed, the
misdeed is not altogether to be regretted; for as one stands in the court of
the castle, and lets one's eye wander from the splendid wing of Francis I.
-which is the last work of free and joyous invention -to the ruled lines and
blank spaces of the ponderous pavilion of Mansard, one makes one's reflections
upon the advantage, in even the least personaI of the arts, of having something
to say, and upon the stupidity of a taste which had ended by becoming an
aggregation of negatives. Gaston's wing,
taken by itself, has much of the _bel air_ which was
to belong to the architecture of Louis XIV.; but, taken in contrast to its
flowering, laughing, living neighbor, it marks the difference be-tween
inspiration and calculation. We scarcely
grudge it its place, however, for it adds a price to the rest of the chateau.
We have entered the court, by the way, by jump-ing over the
walls. The more orthodox method is to
follow a modern, terrace, which leads to the left, from the side of the chateau
that I began by speaking of, and passes round, ascending, to a little square on
a considerably higher level, which is not, like a very modern square on which
the back (as I have called it) looks out, a thoroughfare. This small, empty _place,_
oblong in form, at once bright and quiet, with a cer-tain grass-grown look,
offers an excellent setting to the entrance-front of the palace, - the wing of
Louis XII. The restoration here has been lavish; but it was per-haps but an
inevitable reaction against the injuries, still more lavish, by which the
unfortunate building had long been overwhelmed.
It had fallen into a state of ruinous neglect, relieved only by the
misuse pro-ceeding from successive generations of soldiers, for whom its
charming chambers served as barrack-room. Whitewashed, mutilated, dishonored,
the castle of Blois may be said to have escaped simply
with its life. This is the history of Amboise as well, and is to a certain extent the history of
Chambord.
Delightful, at any rate, was the refreshed facade of Louis XII. as I stood and looked at it one bright September morning. In that soft, clear, merry light of Touraine, everything
shows, everything speaks. Charming are
the taste, the happy proportions, the color of this beautiful front, to which
the new feeling for a purely domestic architec-ture - an architecture of security
and tranquillity, in which art could indulge itself - gave an air of youth and
gladness. It is true that for a long
time to come the castle
of Blois was neither very
safe nor very quiet; but its dangers came from within, from the evil passions
of its inhabitants, and not from siege or in-vasion. The front of Louis XII.
is of red brick, crossed here and there with purple; and the purple slate of
the high roof, relieved with chimneys beautifully treated, and with the
embroidered caps of pinnacles and arches, with the porcupine of Louis, the
ermine and the festooned rope which formed the devices of Anne of Brittany, -
the tone of this rich-looking roof carries out the mild glow of the wall. The wide, fair windows look as if they had
expanded to let in the rosy dawn of the Renaissance. Charming, for that matter, are the windows of
all the chateaux of Touraine, with their squareness corrected (as it is not in
the Tudor architecture) by the curve of the upper corners, which makes this
line look - above the expressive aperture - like a pencilled eyebrow. The low door of this front is crowned by a
high, deep niche, in which, under a splendid canopy, stiffly astride of a
stiffly draped charger, sits in profile an image of the good King Louis. Good as he had been, - the father of his
people, as he was called (I believe he remitted various taxes), - he was not
good enough to pass muster at the Revolution; and the effigy I have just
described is no more than a reproduction of the primitive statue demolished at that
period.
Pass beneath it into the court, and the sixteenth century
closes round you. It is a pardonable
flight of fancy to say that the expressive faces of an age in which human
passions lay very near the surface seem to look out at you from the windows, from the balconies, from
the thick foliage of the sculpture. The portion of the wing of Louis XII. that
looks toward the court is supported on a deep arcade. On your right is the wing erected by Francis
I., the reverse of the mass of building which you see on approaching the
castle. This
exquisite, this extravagant, this trans-cendent piece of architecture is the
most joyous ut-terance of the French Renaissance. It is covered with an embroidery of
sculpture, in which every detail is worthy of the hand of a goldsmith. In the middle of it, or rather a little to
the left, rises the famous wind-ing staircase (plausibly, but I believe not
religiously, restored), which even the ages which most misused it must vaguely
have admired. It forms a kind of chiselled
cylinder, with wide interstices, so that the stairs are open to the air. Every inch of this structure, of its
balconies, its pillars, its great central columns, is wrought over with lovely
images, strange and ingenious devices, prime among which is the great heraldic
sala-mander of Francis I. The salamander
is everywhere at Blois,
- over the chimneys, over the doors, on the walls. This whole quarter ,
of the castle bears the stamp of that eminently pictorial prince. The run-ning cornice along the top of the
front is like all un-folded, an elongated, bracelet. The windows of the attic are like shrines for
saints. The gargoyles, the medallions,
the statuettes, the festoons, are like the elaboration of some precious cabinet
rather than the details of a building exposed to the weather and to the
ages. In the interior there is a
profusion of res-toration, and it is all restoration in color. This has been, evidently, a work of great
energy and cost, but it will easily strike you as overdone. The universal freshness is a discord, a false
note; it seems to light up the dusky past with an unnatural glare. Begun in the reign of Louis Philippe, this
terrible process - the more terrible always the more you admit that it has been
necessary - has been carried so far that there is now scarcely a square inch of
the interior that has the color of the past upon it. It is true that the place had been so coated
over with modern abuse that something was needed to keep it alive; it is only,
per-haps, a pity that the restorers, not content with saving its life, should
have undertaken to restore its youth. The love of consistency, in such a
business, is a dangerous lure. All the
old apartments have been rechristened, as it were; the geography of the castle
has been re-established. The guardrooms,
the bed-rooms, the closets, the oratories, have recovered their identity. Every spot connected with the murder of the
Duke of Guise is pointed out by a small, shrill boy, who takes you from room to
room, and who has learned his lesson in perfection. The place is full of Catherine de' Medici, of
Henry III., of memories, of ghosts, of echoes, of possible evocations and
revivals. It is covered with crimson and gold.
The fireplaces and the ceilings are magnificent; they look like
ex-pensive "sets" at the grand opera.
I should have mentioned that below, in the court, the front
of the wing of Gaston d'Orleans faces you as you enter, so that the place is a
course of French history. Inferior in
beauty and grace to the other portions of the castle, the wing is yet a nobler
monu-ment than the memory of Gaston deserves.
The second of the sons of Henry IV., - who was no more fortunate as a
father than as a husband, - younger brother of Louis XIII., and father of the
great Mademoiselle, the most celebrated, most ambitious, most self-complacent,
and most unsuccessful _fille a marier_ in French history, passed in enforced
retirement at the castle of Blois the close of a life of clumsy intrigues
against Cardinal Richelieu, in which his rashness was only equalled by his
pusillanimity and his ill-luck by his inaccessibility to correction, and which,
after so many follies and shames, was properly summed up in the project -
be-gun, but not completed - of demolishing the beautiful habitation of his
exile in order to erect a better one. With Gaston d'Orleans, however, who lived
there with-out dignity, the history of the Chateau de Blois de-clines. Its interesting period is that of the wars of
religion. It was the chief residence of
Henry III., and the scene of the princip